Vol. 20 (2024)
Artigos

Diagnostic proposal for Library Service Platform implementation

Rafael Eich
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
Bio
Márcia Feijão de Figueiredo
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
Bio

Published 2024-03-09

Keywords

  • Plataformas de Serviços de Bibliotecas,
  • Sistemas Integrados de Gestão de Bibliotecas,
  • Integração de sistemas,
  • Implementação de sistemas,
  • Consórcios de bibliotecas,
  • Cooperação entre bibliotecas
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Eich, R., & Feijão de Figueiredo, M. (2024). Diagnostic proposal for Library Service Platform implementation. Revista Brasileira De Biblioteconomia E Documentação, 20, 1–24. Retrieved from https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1955

Abstract

To propose a diagnostic tool for implementation Library Service Platforms (LSPs), investigate previous implementation cases, and present methodologies for library system implementation. Using literature and previous implementation cases, the study analyzes three main LSPs: Alma, FOLIO, and WorldShare Management Services (WMS). The adopted methodology involved reviewing diagnostics developed by authors such as Rowley (2002), Café, Santos, and Macedo (2001) and implementation experiences such as Figueiredo and Terra (2016). The LSPs were evaluated based on their evolution and new features, proposing a consolidated approach for application in Brazilian libraries. As results, diagnostic criteria compatible with the identified functions in the three main LSPs (Alma, FOLIO, and WMS) were proposed, which can be used to determine the applicability and usefulness of LSP in an institution and to request information from LSP providers. Advantages of adopting LSPs were also highlighted, such as cost savings, increased system integration, workflow improvement, resource and tool sharing, enhanced analysis, interoperability, and extensibility. Additionally, the study emphasizes the need to pay attention to data security and the training and engagement of involved teams. As final considerations, the study suggests the possibility of Brazilian library consortia sharing LSPs, similar to the American scenario, to strengthen bargaining power and obtain financial advantages. The research also identifies the need for more studies on the subject, considering the small volume of resources dedicated to this topic.

References

  1. CAFÉ, Lígia; SANTOS, Christophe dos; MACEDO, Flávia. Proposta de um método para escolha de software de automação de bibliotecas. Ciência da Informação, v. 30, n. 2, 2001. Disponível em: https://brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/v/21975. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  2. CORNISH, Al; JOST, Richard; ARCH, Xan. Selecting a Shared 21st Century Management System. Collaborative Librarianship, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-16, 1 jan. 2013. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol5/iss1/3. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  3. CÔRTE, Adelaide Ramos e; ROCHA, Eunice Gomes; ALMEIDA, Ivanise Marinho de; LAGO, Washington Garcia. Avaliação de softwares para bibliotecas e arquivos: uma visão do cenário nacional 2. ed. rev. e ampl. São Paulo: Pólis, 2002. v. 1. 221p. Disponível em: https://abecin.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Avaliacao-de-softwares-2.pdf. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  4. FIGUEIREDO, Márcia Feijão de; TERRA, Isabela Cristina Teles. A implementação do Koha no Colégio Pedro II em quatro atos. Revista ACB, v. 21, n. 1, p. 253–264, 11 mar. 2016. Disponível em: https://revista.acbsc.org.br/racb/article/view/1154. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  5. FU, Ping; CARMEN, Julie. Migration to Alma/Primo: A Case Study of Central Washington University. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, v. 40, p. 31-37, 31 ago. 2015. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/libraryfac/30/. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  6. ROWLEY, Jennifer. A biblioteca eletrônica. 2. ed. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos Livros, 2002. 399 p. ISBN: 85-85637-20-X.
  7. SHADLE, Steve; DAVIS, Susan. Wrangling Cats: A Case Study of a Library Consortium Migration. The Serials Librarian, v. 70, n. 1–4, p. 116–120, 18 maio 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1148421. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  8. STEWART, Morag; MORRISON, Cheryl Aine. Breaking Ground: Consortial Migration to a Next-Generation ILS and Its Impact on Acquisitions Workflows. Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 60, n. 4, p. 259–269, 7 out. 2016. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.60n4.259. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
  9. TONDING, Fabiana John; VANZ, Samile Andréa de Souza. Plataformas de serviços de bibliotecas: a evolução dos sistemas para gerenciamento de bibliotecas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 23, n. 4, p. 73-96, 2018. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/108430. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2022.
  10. VIANA, Michelângelo. Sistemas de Informação para Bibliotecas Universitárias: análise multicritérios. In: SEMINÁRIO NACIONAL DE BIBLIOTECAS UNIVERSITÁRIAS, 18., 2014, Belo Horizonte. Anais [...] Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.bu.ufmg.br/snbu2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/PDF_Minicurso-10.pdf. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.