Vol. 19 (2023): Jubileu de ouro
Artigos

Virtues and trends for indicators for evaluation of the Information Literacy, according to technical, aesthetic, ethical and political dimensions

PDF (Português (Brasil))
  • Elizete Vieira Vitorino,
  • Andréia Letícia Johann
Elizete Vieira Vitorino
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Andréia Letícia Johann
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Published 2023-09-03

Keywords

  • Competência em informação - Indicadores,
  • Competência em informação - Avaliação,
  • Competência em informação - Dimensões,
  • Competência em informação - Virtudes,
  • Competência em informação - Tendências

How to Cite

Vitorino, E. V., & Johann, A. L. (2023). Virtues and trends for indicators for evaluation of the Information Literacy, according to technical, aesthetic, ethical and political dimensions. Revista Brasileira De Biblioteconomia E Documentação, 19, 1–24. Retrieved from https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1922

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this paper, the literature recommendations are presented as to "virtues" (characteristics and qualities of the parameters) and, as to "trends" (possibilities of applications and possible innovations to indicators), according to the dimensions of Information Literacy (technical, aesthetic, ethical and political). The contents obtained in the searches are grouped according to the technical dimension (results linked to Information and Communication Technology (ICT); the aesthetic dimension (results linked to emotion and innovation); the ethical dimension (results linked to critical reflection); and the political dimension (results linked to the collective, the social). Considering the data obtained from the bibliographic research carried out in the Scopus, Web of Science, ISTA and LISTA databases, some historical aspects were identified, as well as possibilities, virtues, and trends for indicators to evaluate Information Literacy. This is part of a research and some specific aspects, but they may be useful for the definition of parameters, guidelines, and frameworks. The opportunity and the responsibility to structure indicators for the evaluation of Information Literacy that integrate in a balanced way the technical, aesthetic, ethical and political dimensions, to produce subsidies for government public policies, presents itself - more than deserved - in times of profound misinformation.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

  1. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (ALA). Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). ACRL Guide to Policies and Procedures, Chapter 14: Standards, Guidelines, and Frameworks. ALA/ACRL, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ala.org/acrl/resources/policies/chapter14. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2022.
  2. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (ALA). Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago: ALA, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/framework1.pdf. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2022.
  3. BAWDEN, David; ROBINSON, Lyn. Curating the infosphere: Luciano Floridi's Philosophy of Information as the foundation for Library and Information Science. Journal of Documentation, v. 74, n. 1, p. 2-17, 2018. Disponível em: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17713/1/curating%20the%20infosphere.pdf. Acesso em: 08 dez. 2022.
  4. BURNS, Elizabeth A.; GROSS, Melissa; LATHAM, Don. The Information Literacy Continuum, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2019. Disponível em: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/slw/index.php/slw/article/view/8232. Acesso em: 17 out. 2022.
  5. ERCEGOVAC, Zorana. Information Access Instruction (IAI4): design principles. College & Research Libraries, v. 56, n. 3, p. 249-257, 1995. Disponível em: https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/14968/16414. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2022.
  6. FACHIN, Odília. Fundamentos de metodologia: noções básicas em pesquisa científica. 6. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017. ISBN: 9788502636538. Disponível em: http://maratavarespsictics.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/74302802/FACHIN-Odilia-fundamentos-de-Metodologia.pdf
  7. FILBERT, Nathan W. Framing the framework: the rigorous responsibilities of Library and Information Science. Reference & User Services Quarterly (Management), v. 55, n. 3, p. 199-202, 2016. Disponível em: https://journals.ala.org/index.php/rusq/article/view/5929/7516. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2021.
  8. FOURI, Ina. Learning from research on the information behaviour of healthcare professionals: a review of the literature 2004–2008 with a focus on emotion. Health Information and Libraries Journal, v. 26, n. 3, p.171–186, 2009. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00860.x. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2021.
  9. GREGORY, Lua; HIGGINS, Shana. Reorienting an Information Literacy Program toward Social Justice: Mapping the Core Values of Librarianship to the ACRL Framework. Communications in Information Literacy, v. 11, n. 1, p. 42-54, 2017. Disponível em: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/14/. Acesso em: 05 set. 2022.
  10. GUPTA, Ritu; KUMBAR, B. D.; TIWARI, Rishi. Ranking of Indian Universities in Social Sciences using Bibliometric Indicators during 2008-12. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, v. 34, n. 3, p. 197-205, 2014. Disponível em: https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/7340/4047. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2022.
  11. HORTON JR., Forest Woody. Overview of Information Literacy Resources Worldwide: Helping people to easily and quickly find the information they need. 2. ed. Paris: UNESCO, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/information-literacy/publications/unesco_composite_document_-_final_-_2.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2022.
  12. KUGLITSCH, Rebecca Z. Teaching for transfer: reconciling the framework with disciplinary information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, v. 15, n. 3, p. 457-470, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0040. Acesso em: 03 fev. 2022.
  13. LAU, Jesús. Diretrizes sobre desenvolvimento de habilidades em informação para a aprendizagem permanente. The Hague: IFLA, 2007. Tradução para o português por Regina Célia Baptista Belluzzo, jul. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/information-literacy/publications/ifla-guidelines-pt.pdf. Acesso em: 08 dez. 2022.
  14. MARZAL, Miguel Ángel; PARRA, Pablo, COLMENERO, María Jesús. La medición de impacto y evaluación de programas de alfabetización en información para bibliotecas escolares. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, v. 34, n. 2, 2011, p. 190-211. Disponível em: https://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/692. Acesso em: 19 nov. 2022.
  15. MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. 21. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002.
  16. REED, Kim Leeder. Square Peg in a Round Hole? The Framework for Information Literacy in the Community College Environment. Journal of Library Administration, v. 55, n. 3, p. 235-248, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276292487_Square_Peg_in_a_Round_Hole_The_Framework_for_Information_Literacy_in_the_Community_College_Environment. Acesso em 08 dez. 2022.
  17. RICHARDSON, Roberto Jarry. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012.
  18. SEVERINO, Antônio Joaquim. Metodologia de Trabalho Científico. 23. ed. São Paulo: Editora Cortez, 2007. ISBN 9788524913112. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/3480016/mod_label/intro/SEVERINO_Metodologia_do_Trabalho_Cientifico_2007.pdf. Acesso em: 10 set. 2022.
  19. SHORISH, Yasmeen. Data information literacy and undergraduates: a critical competency. Libraries, n. 27, p. 97-106, 2015. Disponível em: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/letfspubs/27. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2021.
  20. URIBE-TIRADO, Alejandro; PINTO, María; MACHIN-MASTROMATTEO, Juan D. Developing information literacy programs: Best practices from Latin America, Spain and Portugal. Information Development, v. 33, n. 5, p. 543-549, 2017. Disponível em: https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/handle/10495/9402. Acesso em: 09 dez. 2021.
  21. VERMA, Manoj Kumar; SHUKLA, Ravi. Mapping the Research Trends on Information Literacy of Selected Countries during 2008-2017: A Scientometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, v. 39, n. 3, p. 125-130, 2019. Disponível em: https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/14007/7096. Acesso em 24 mar. 2022.
  22. VITORINO, Elizete Vieira. Indicadores para a competência em informação no Brasil: virtudes e tendências. In: PARRA VALERO, Pablo; CUEVAS CERVERÓ, Aurora; SIMEÃO, Elmira; COLMENERO RUIZ, María Jesús. (coords). Competencias en información y transformación digital de la sociedade. Madrid: Universidad Complutense, Facultad de Ciencias de la Documentación, Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, 2021. ISBN: 978-84-09-24527-7. Disponível em: https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/71169/1/COMPETENCIAS%20EN%20INFORMACION.pdf. Acesso em: 17 set. 2022. p. 87-104.
  23. VITORINO, Elizete Vieira. Indicadores para a competência em informação no Brasil: virtudes, tendências e possibilidades. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 27, n. 2, p. 7-36, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/39996/30698. Acesso em: 17 set. 2022.
  24. VITORINO, Elizete Vieira; DE LUCCA, Djuli Machado. (org.). As dimensões da competência em informação: técnica, estética, ética e política. Porto Velho, RO: EDUFRO, 2020. 240 p. ISBN: 978-65-87539-16-4 (físico) ISBN: 978-65-87539-06-5 (digital). Disponível em: http://www.edufro.unir.br/uploads/08899242/Capas%206/As%20Dimensoes%20da%20Competencia%20em%20Informacao.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2022.
  25. VITORINO, Elizete Vieira; PIANTOLA, Daniela. Dimensões da competência informacional. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, DF, v. 40, n. 1, p. 99-110, 2011. Disponível em: http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1328. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2022.
  26. WALTERS, William H. ; SHEEHAN, Sarah E. ; HANDFIELD, Amy E. ; LÓPEZ-FITZSIMMONS, Bernadette; MARKGREN, Susanne; PARADISE, Laurin. A multi-method information literacy assessment program: foundation and early results. Libraries and the Academy, v. 20, n. 1, p. 101-135, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0006. Acesso em 04 nov. 2021.
  27. WEINER, Sharon A. How information literacy becomes policy: an analysis using the Multiple Streams Framework. Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research. n. 70, p. 297-311, 2011. Disponível em: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=lib_fsdocs. Acesso em: 06 dez. 2021.
  28. ZURKOWSKI, Paul. Information services environment relationships and priorities. Washington, D.C: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, 1974. Disponível em: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf. Acesso em: 08 dez. 2022.